Showing posts with label IP address. Show all posts
Showing posts with label IP address. Show all posts

Saturday, August 10, 2013

Snowden Wikipedia page edited from a Senate computer to say ‘traitor’


Published time: August 06, 2013 16:17
Edited time: August 07, 2013 14:14

Reuters / Ueslei Marcelino
Reuters / Ueslei Marcelino

Someone in the Senate isn’t a fan of Edward Snowden, and they’re using Wikipedia to get their point across.
The Wikipedia page for the man responsible for leaking classified National Security Agency files to the media has been updated hundreds of times since he started sharing sensitive documents in early June, but one of those revisions — and a questionable one at that — comes courtesy of someone in the United States Senate.
On Friday, someone logged into Wikipedia and changed a line in Snowden’s biography from "American dissident” to "American traitor.” Joe Klock at The Daily Dot website was the first one to report on the edit, and quickly noticed that the revision was made from a computer connected to the Internet from within the walls of a US Senate building.
The word change only stayed on the Snowden page for around one minute, but it still managed to create quite a stir.
On a discussion page for the entry, one Wikipedia editor confirmed that the change was made by someone with access to a Senate computer.
“The edit was made by this IP and the IP does belong to the US Senate. The edit was reverted within 1 minute due to the fact that it does not reflect a neutral point of view which is one of the Five Pillars that governs how Wikipedia operates. In that way, Wikipedia not only performed as it should but it did so incredibly quickly,” the post reads.
Nailing the perpetrator responsible for that single edit will likely be task all too impossible, though. While the IP address behind the change is indeed registered to the Senate, it isn’t restricted to one particular user.
“If the agency or facility uses proxy servers, this IP address may represent many users at many personal computers or devices,” the discussion page acknowledges.
Screenshot from wikipedia.org
Screenshot from wikipedia.org


Read More  Here

Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, August 8, 2013

Malware planted on the servers of Freedom Hosting : How did the FBI penetrated the supposedly anonymous TOR Network ?

 

In the  Administrations  own  words  cyber  attacks  against the  United  States  would  be  interpreted  as  a  declaration of   war. 

Are  we   then to  understand that   cyber  attacks  perpetrated  by the  United  States  against other  countries (Mostly  allies)  are  a  declaration of  war  as  well?

Are  we  also to  understand that  the United  States government (including those in  Congress  who legitimize the  Prism  program) have now  openly  declared  war  upon the  American  people with this  attack on the Tor Network being used  to escape  their snooping and  ever increasing  invasion of  privacy?

Are  we  not  to  use the  same  measure  that  they have  reserved  for  themselves  in the  name  of  National  Security?

How  long and  how  far  will  this  be allowed to  continue without  being  called into  question?

~Desert Rose~
***************************************************

 

NSA's Cyber Army Attacks the Navy's Tor Network, Gives Spoils to the FBI


Dees Illustration
Eric Blair
Activist Post
It was reported earlier this week that the FBI won a great victory by stopping the largest child porn distributor on the Internet. The FBI's victory lap was cut short when some of the details of how they did it were more closely examined.
What the FBI actually did was seize a hosting service on the hidden TOR Network.  The owner of the hosting service Freedom Hosting was not directly involved in the production or distribution of child porn, he just provided anonymous hosting used by pedophile pornographers.
The bigger question became how the FBI penetrated the supposedly anonymous TOR Network. That's where the story gets interesting.
TOR, short for The Onion Router, was originally developed by the Navy Research Laboratory to provide an anonymous secondary internetwork for the government to use.  Supposedly the project was abandoned by the Navy only to be picked up by open-source volunteers who now run the Tor Project.
Despite its beginnings as a government project, most believe TOR to be the best current option for online anonymity.  But does this recent compromise of TOR reveal that it's also part of the surveillance grid?  The long answer is complicated, but the short answer is no.
First, the NSA has been identified as the source of the malware bomb used to take down Freedom Hosting - not the FBI who claimed victory in the investigation and apprehension.
Arstechnica writes:
Malware planted on the servers of Freedom Hosting—the "hidden service" hosting provider on the Tor anonymized network brought down late last week—may have de-anonymized visitors to the sites running on that service. This issue could send identifying information about site visitors to an Internet Protocol address that was hard-coded into the script the malware injected into browsers. And it appears the IP address in question belongs to the National Security Agency (NSA).

Read More Here

Enhanced by Zemanta