Showing posts with label Standard & Poor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Standard & Poor. Show all posts

Sunday, February 9, 2014

Danske Bank A/S suspended six employees after Danish prosecutors started a probe into price manipulation on mortgage bond trades conducted in 2009.

Danske Suspends Six Bankers as Prosecutor Probes Bond Trades

By Peter Levring Feb 7, 2014 11:01 AM CT

Photographer: Freya Ingrid Morales/Bloomberg
Customers use automated teller machines (ATM) outside a Danske Bank A/S branch in Copenhagen.
Danske Bank A/S (DANSKE) suspended six employees after Danish prosecutors started a probe into price manipulation on mortgage bond trades conducted in 2009.
The Danish Public Prosecutor for Serious Economic and International Crime has today “brought accusations against Danske Bank of price manipulation under particularly aggravated circumstances,” the Copenhagen-based bank said.
Danske said an internal investigation found that its rules had been violated in transactions between its home-loan arm, Realkredit Danmark A/S, and Danske Bank in the mortgage bond market. The bank said it notified the Financial Supervisory Authority, prompting the police investigation against Realkredit Danmark, Danske Bank and six employees.
“Usually we say that price manipulation will, as a minimum, lead to jail time if they’re convicted,” Hans Fogtdal, a public prosecutor with the crime squad, said by phone. “None of the involved seems to have had a personal motive to commit the crime. It was about securing Danske Bank an additional profit.” The maximum time the employees face behind bars is four years, he said.
Denmark’s $550 billion mortgage bond market is the world’s largest per capita and more than 1 1/2 times the size of the economy. Consumers and businesses in the Nordic nation finance their home loans using bonds. Realkredit Danmark is the country’s biggest provider of bond-backed home loans after Nykredit Realkredit A/S.
Read More Here
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, January 1, 2014

Wall Street posts record gains as millions of Americans face a year of more cuts



- Lauren McCauley, staff writer
(Photo: Zoonabar/ cc via Flickr)Bankers on Wall Street rang in the final hours of 2013 with gains unseen in almost twenty years. However, for roughly half of America, these stock market highs mean nothing as they face a new year with little work and even less of a safety net.
"Never, I don't think, in recent history have you had unemployment this chronically high for so long with the market having done this well," Roben Farzad, an economics writer and contributor to Bloomberg's Businessweek, said on PBS Newshour Tuesday.
"There's a stat that Obama's bull market just beat Ronald Reagan's. I dare say, if you canvass the man on the street, no one would guess that we beat the decade of decadence already. You're certainly not feeling it out there," he continued.
At the end of the day Tuesday, the Standard & Poor index closed with a nearly 30 percent gain, its best since 1997. The Dow Jones Industrial Average also closed at a record high, reaching 16,576.73, up 26.5 percent on the year—marking the largest annual jump since 1996.
And, according to the Wall Street Journal, when dividends are taken into account, stocks posted their best returns since 1995.
However, for the half of Americans who avoid or cannot afford to dally in the stock market, these gains are inconsequential. With the unemployment rate currently near 7 percent, it's clear that many of these corporate gains have not had any positive impact on working people.
As corporate profits after taxes have grown 30 percent since 2007 and the number of jobs is still below its pre-recession level, Farzad asks: "At what point do you see companies feeling so flush, so hale that they see their stock prices and market capitalizations up that they have to go out and hire?"
As Huffington Post reporter Mark Gongloff points out, "corporate profits are soaring largely because companies have been squeezing costs—especially labor costs."
With a scant rise of just 2.1 percent, hourly wages have "barely budged since the market bottomed in 2009," Gongloff reports, "while the Dow has skyrocketed 153 percent."
And for the "man on the street," the New Year will bring changes of another measure.
On Saturday, emergency federal unemployment benefits were allowed to expire for 1.3 million people who have been unemployed more than six months.
"These are precisely the jobless who will suffer most from a cutoff, since they have been scraping by on unemployment checks for so long that their financial situations are already precarious, if not dire," writes Washington Post columnist Eugene Robinson.
Compounding these "dire" financial straits, 2013 also saw the gutting of essential social safety nets.
In November, food stamp benefits were slashed for an estimated 48 million people, including 22 million children, by an average of 7%.
As The Guardian's Karen McVeigh reported last week:
As these cuts begin to bite, even harsher reductions are in prospect. Republicans in the House of Representatives have proposed $38bn cuts over 10 years, in their latest version of a long-delayed farm bill that would also require new work requirements and drug tests for food stamp recipients.
_____________________
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, October 17, 2013

Government shutdown hurt the economy, but how much?


Posted Thursday, Oct. 17, 2013
Read more here: http://www.star-telegram.com/2013/10/16/5252548/government-shutdown-hurt-the-economy.html?rh=1#storylink=cpy
How much damage was inflicted on the economy? That’s the million-dollar question as a 16-day partial government shutdown draws to an end and a crippling debt default apparently was averted.
The economy already was slowing ahead of the debacle in Washington, and for more than half of October, there’s been no official government data on which to gauge the health of the economy.
“It feels like things have gone a bit soft, but we really don’t have the hard data to know to what degree that happened,” said Mark Zandi, the chief economist for forecaster Moody’s Analytics.
There’s plenty of anecdotal evidence, though, that harm has been done.
One gauge came Wednesday from the Investment Company Institute, which reported that for the week ending Oct. 9, investors had pulled about $3.1 billion out of mutual funds composed of stocks and another $2.6 billion fled these funds made up of bonds.
More evidence came in the recent Economic Confidence Index, published regularly by Gallup. The reading for the three-day period that ended Oct. 3 had fallen 12 points in less than a week. That caught the attention of the National Retail Federation, whose members hire in big numbers.
“Only the collapse of Lehman Brothers in September 2008 has done more damage to consumer confidence in such a short period of time,” the retail federation said Oct. 9 in a statement. “Retailers represent the sector of the American economy that is most closely tied to consumer attitudes, and these numbers are deeply concerning.”
A week later, the confidence reading had fallen another 5 points.
Gallup’s numbers in August 2011, the last debt-ceiling battle, showed sharp drops in confidence that later translated into lower retail sales and economic deterioration.
This year’s uncertainty follows a drag on growth that began early this year with the end of a holiday on payroll taxes and continued with reduced federal spending, especially defense spending.
Economists think that these factors and political squabbling will combine to shave about 1.5 percentage points off what the nation’s growth rate otherwise would have been in 2013.
“I don’t think it has undermined the recovery . . . but it certainly is going to take a bite out of growth,” Zandi said. “Brinksmanship just adds to the weight of fiscal policy on the economy.”
Wells Fargo Securities in Charlotte, N.C., estimates that the shutdown will lop off no more than half a percentage point of growth over the final three months of this year.
“The primary reason for the minimal economic impact during this shutdown stems from the fact that most of the negative effects and the subsequent positive bounce-back effects are currently expected to be contained within the same quarter of growth,” John Silvia, the group’s chief economist, wrote Wednesday.
Economists are looking carefully at same-store sales and similar retail data to gauge how much the sap in confidence will affect holiday sales.


Read More Here


*******************************************************

Government shutdown took $24 billion out of economy, according to Standard & Poor's


Posted: 8:09 PM
Last Updated: 18 hours and 11 minutes ago
NEW YORK - The United States may have dodged an economic catastrophe by raising the debt ceiling and opening the government, but it didn't emerge from the political debacle unscathed.
The 16-day government shutdown took a $24 billion chunk out of the U.S. economy, according to an initial analysis from Standard & Poor's.
As a result, the rating agency projects that the U.S. economy will grow by an annual pace of around 2.4% in the fourth quarter -- as opposed to the roughly 3% growth rate predicted prior to the shutdown.
"Given the size of the economy, it's small. But because it's happening all at once, so quick, so fast, unplanned; it's going to hurt," said Beth Ann Bovino, U.S. chief economist at S&P. "We can absorb it, but it still hurts."
Hundreds of thousands of federal workers were furloughed during the shutdown, but that was just one of the widespread effects of the first shutdown in nearly two decades.
Federal contractors also furloughed thousands of employees. Small businesses reeled from frozen government contracts and stalled business loans. Closed national parks hit the tourism industry, while military families saw childcare and other services shuttered.

Read More Here


*******************************************************
Read more here: http://www.star-telegram.com/2013/10/16/5252548/government-shutdown-hurt-the-economy.html?rh=1#storylink=cpy
Enhanced by Zemanta