Showing posts with label Democrat. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Democrat. Show all posts

Thursday, October 1, 2015

Elizabeth Warren, kickin butts and taking names on Capitol Hill and Wall Street.....

Warren Increases the Pain Factor for Choosing Corporate-Friendly Democrats

Unofficial _Sources


Sep. 8 2015, 4:11 p.m.
A little-noticed report on candidates for an open spot on the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) reaffirms that the reformist wing of the Democratic Party is winning the tactical battle over financial regulatory personnel.

Luis Aguilar, one of three Democratic SEC commissioners on the five-member panel, announced he would step down in May. Initially, the White House floated as a replacement Keir Gumbs, who has passed through the revolving door, from SEC staff to the white-collar corporate law firm Covington & Burling.

Covington & Burling counts most major U.S. banks among its clients, and is the home of former Attorney General Eric Holder and several of his top deputies. While at Covington, Gumbs allegedly gave CEOs tutorials on how to avoid disclosing their corporate political spending. He also represented the American Petroleum Institute before the SEC.

Read More Here

Friday, November 22, 2013

The Constitution is chock-full of provisions to protect minority rights. Harry Reid thinks he knows better.

WSJ

Tom C. Korologos: The Senate Goes Nuclear, Fallout to Come

The Constitution is chock-full of provisions to protect minority rights. Harry Reid thinks he knows better.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Sen. Charles Schumer after a news conference Thursday about changing Senate rules.
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
Classical Greeks called it “ochlocracy.” Alexis de Tocqueville referred to the “tyranny of the majority.” James Madison warned of “the Superior force of an interested and overbearing majority.” Someone else said, “It’s like two foxes and a hen voting on what to have for dinner.”
Now “nuclear option” has found its way into popular discourse about majority rule—thanks to Senate Democrats who on Thursday broke the filibuster rule and ended the traditional supermajority of 60 votes needed to confirm judicial and executive-branch nominees. In leading the charge, Majority Leader Harry Reid erased 225 years of precedent and altered the soul of the U.S. Senate.
Welcome to a Senate that no longer is “the world’s greatest deliberative body.” Welcome to a Senate that has now formally completed the polarization of the two parties. Uncharted waters lie ahead.
The Founding Fathers, taking note of various definitions regarding so-called majority rule, made it very clear when they drafted the Constitution that its operating principle would not be majority rule, but rather protection of the rights of the minority.
To that end, the Constitution is chock-full of requirements to protect the minority. The original premise of the American system is checks and balances. Three branches of government—legislative, executive and judicial, in that order—are the subject of the first three Articles of the Constitution. Each limits the power of the others. Consider:

Read More Here

..........

Harry Reid asks, ‘What would you have done?’

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nev. pauses during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Nov. 21, 2013, after the Democrat majority in the Senate pushed through a major rules change, one that curbs the power of the Republican minority to block President Barack Obama's nominations for high-level judgeships and cabinet and agency officials. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. (Jacquelyn Martin/Associated Press)

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid just called to ask a perfectly fair question about my column criticizing the Democrats’ filibuster rules change: “What would you have done?”
This is, of course, the sort of problem that actual lawmakers have to wrestle with and that armchair pundits can excuse themselves from addressing.  As the Nevada Democrat saw matters, he had no choice. “They were mocking me,” he said. “They were mocking us.” By blocking all three of President Obama’s nominees to the  federal Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit – all four, actually, including one who gave up after languishing for two years — “They kind of dared us to do it,” Reid said.
Senate Republicans’ behavior with respect to Obama’s judicial nominees has been outrageous.  Certainly, Democrats during their time in the minority behaved badly in confirming, or refusing to confirm, Republican nominees, but in nowhere near the numbers of Republicans.  As Reid noted, there have been 23 filibusters of district court nominees total — 20 during the last 4 1/2 years.

Read More Here

..........

Bloomberg.com

Harry Reid’s Filibuster Gamble

The U.S. Senate finally took action today to diminish the effects of political polarization. It was pretty much a party-line vote.
With 50 Democrats (and two independents) voting in favor and all 45 Republicans (and three Democrats) opposed, the Senate opted to eliminate the filibuster for executive appointments and most judicial nominations. It’s a sensible change, as far as it goes. The question is: How far will it go? The filibuster remains available for legislation and Supreme Court nominees. But it’s questionable how long even that tradition can last.
The filibuster, intended as a protection of minority rights, has become instead a tool to obstruct majority rule. Reasonable minds -- some of them even in the Senate -- can disagree about where protection stops and obstruction begins. But there can be little doubt about what happened in recent weeks, when Republicans used it to prevent three qualified nominees from taking the bench in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. Republicans complained that President Barack Obama’s appointments would shift the ideology on the court. Well, yes, that’s one of his prerogatives, isn’t it?
The filibuster is a world-class source of frustration. Its most famous service was in the cause of delaying civil rights to American blacks. Yet the filibuster is also emblematic of a Senate culture that, by design and evolution, has afforded the minority party far more power than it is permitted in the House of Representatives.

Read More Here
..........
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, October 6, 2013

Rep. Michaud Condemns Use of Veterans as Political Pawns : 164 Democrats Vote Against Funding Veteran's Benefits

File:Veterans Day poster 2002.jpg
>

                                                      Image Source  :  Wikimedia . Org
         United States Department of Veterans Affairs; Veterans Day National Committee

****************************************************************

 Rep. Michaud Condemns Use of Veterans as Political Pawns

|
WASHINGTON, DC – Today, Representative Mike Michaud (ME-02), Ranking Member of the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee, spoke on the House floor today during debate on H.J.Res. 72, a bill that partially funds VA operations and furthers the standoff over the government shutdown. Michaud has previously spoken out against piecemeal approaches pursued by Republican leaders.
“This House bill, like the others before them, will not be considered by the Senate and the President has said he will veto it. Instead of waging a PR war and wasting time on bills that will go nowhere, House Republicans should pursue a solution to the shutdown that could actually pass both chambers and be signed by the President,” said Michaud.
In a letter sent to Congress today, the Veterans of Foreign Wars, Disabled American Veterans, AMVETS, and Paralyzed Veterans of America called on Congress to provide the full year’s funding for all veterans programs, adding that “funding the operations of the VA through short-term continuing resolutions (CRs) or other stop-gap measures are not acceptable solutions.”
“Congress must stop using veterans in this partisan game and end this shutdown now,” said Michaud.
Michaud’s remarks on the House floor today, as prepared for delivery, can be found below:





******************************************************************

164 Democrats Vote Against Funding Veterans’ Benefits

HJ Res. 72

Vote summary: 264-164. Failed (required 2/3 majority).
H J RES 72      2/3 YEA-AND-NAY      1-Oct-2013      7:44 PM
QUESTION:  On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass
BILL TITLE: Making continuing appropriations for veterans benefits for fiscal year 2014, and for other purposes
 YeasNaysPRESNV
Republican231  1
Democratic33164 3
Independent    
TOTALS264164 4
This bill would have restored funding for American veterans’ benefits. The 164 Democrats listed on this page don’t think veterans’ benefits are important enough to pay for. These 164 Democrats (no Republican voted against the bill) voted to block funding for veterans’ benefits.
Click the tweet [links] to ask them why.

See More Here



******************************************************************

Harry Reid blocks funding for veterans programs, national parks

By JOEL GEHRKE | OCTOBER 3, 2013 AT 1:38 PM
Senate Democrats blocked four resolutions to fund government programs, including paying the National Guard and opening national parks, as Republicans offered the limited measures in an attempt to win the government shutdown fight by financing popular programs and leaving those they oppose untouched.
“Unbelievably, today Senate Democrats went on record to oppose funding for National Guard and Reserve salaries, veterans’ services, lifesaving medicine and cures, and national parks and museums," Senate Republican Conference chairman John Thune, R-S.D., said in a release following the procedural battle.
"Congress unanimously passed a bill to ensure active-duty military personnel are paid during this lapse in government funding, and it’s unclear why Senate Democrats wouldn’t pass similar measures to fund these important services,” Thune said.


Read More Here



******************************************************************


Military keeps Camp David open, cuts NFL, baseball coverage to troops overseas

By PAUL BEDARD | OCTOBER 4, 2013 AT 2:12 PM
President Obama has visited the Navy-run presidential retreat Camp David in central Maryland only 32 times, but it is being kept open during the government shutdown for his entertainment and security at the same time the Pentagon is cutting sports coverage to hundreds of thousands of troops around the world.
A phone call to the retreat found it open, confirming a TMZ report.
Camp David is one of the most highly secure areas in the nation and provides the president with a safe haven. The president has been known to shoot skeet at Camp David, which he most recently used for his 52nd birthday, according to CBS White House Correspondent Mark Knoller.


Read More Here



******************************************************************

Pelosi, Pingree and Michaud vote against funding for veterans benefits

Michaud-Pingree
Reps. Michael Michaud (left) and Chellie Pingree (right) voted Tuesday against continuing funding for veterans benefits
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Amid the shutdown turmoil in the nation’s capital city, 33 House Democrats crossed party lines Tuesday night to support a GOP measure to restore funding for veterans benefits for fiscal year 2014.
The resolution failed (264 – 164) to get the two-thirds vote threshold required for passage in the House under a suspension of the rules. Reps. Michael Michaud and Chellie Pingree joined House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) to help defeat the resolution.
The failure of the measure offers little assurance to veterans, whose benefits have been jeopardized by the uncertainty of partisan chaos in grid-locked D.C. Although October’s benefit checks have already gone out, a prolonged shutdown could place November’s payments in doubt. Moreover, the backlog of veterans benefits claims, which only recently has begun to shrink, will certainly grow since many VA staffers have been furloughed.
The vote is especially problematic for Michaud, who has abdicated his congressional seat to run for governor, and who has made veterans affairs the signature issue of his decade in Congress. Michaud’s vote also runs contrary to statements he made on Tuesday regarding appropriations for veterans benefits in light of the partial federal shutdown.


Read More Here



******************************************************************
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, June 15, 2013

Some Humor At The Myopic Right / Left Paradigm's Expense

WARNING!!!

***Please do not proceed if you are easily offended by political humor ***

*******************************************************************************

Barack Milhous Obama

DarcPrynce [youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z5JgWHN04nI] ****************************************************************************

Mark Levin Eviscerates The RINO Establishment

DarcPrynce [youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twc74HZWBTo]
******************************************************************************

Candidate Obama debates President Obama on Government Surveillance

SaveTheFourth Amendment SaveTheFourth Amendment
[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BmdovYztH8] ********************************************************************************

Republicans On Legitimate Rape - Todd Akin, Paul Ryan (TJDS)

townsquare townsquare [youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hoYRzFBzwAg] ********************************************************************************

Republican Rep: Todd Akin Was 'Partly Right' About 'Legitimate Rape'!

SamSeder [youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euru6bJJ6YU]
Published on Jan 11, 2013
Georgia Congressman Phil Gingrey has come out to "half - endorsed" Tod Akin's rape theory. Making matters somewhat more disturbing is he's an OB-GYN. Sam responds and plays a classic Gingrey bit from the Break Room Live days with Marc Maron... *******************************************************************************

Mayor Embarrasses Himself In Interview (Oh My God!)

townsquare townsquare Mayor Embarrasses Himself In Interview (Oh My God!) townsquare townsquare *****************************************************************************

Dumb Elitist Liberal.mpg

StryperTheCat StryperTheCat [youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nU9yo86dF94] ****************************************************************************

Dennis Miller Reflects Upon The 'Geniuses' on the Left

welovesarahpalin welovesarahpalin [youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qf8vSjKlVtQ] ******************************************************************************

Dennis Miller: Why Criticizing Obama is Not Racist

Kyle Becker Kyle Becker [youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gywr08sivBM] ****************************************************************************