Les Grossman
Published on Aug 16, 2013
WASHINGTON
— The National Security Agency has broken privacy rules or overstepped
its legal authority thousands of times each year since Congress granted
the agency broad new powers in 2008, The Washington Post reported
Thursday.
Most of the infractions involve unauthorized
surveillance of Americans or foreign intelligence targets in the United
States, both of which are restricted by law and executive order. They
range from significant violations of law to typographical errors that
resulted in unintended interception of U.S. emails and telephone calls,
the Post said, citing an internal audit and other top-secret documents
provided it earlier this summer from NSA leaker Edward Snowden, a former
systems analyst with the agency.In one of the documents, agency personnel are instructed to remove details and substitute more generic language in reports to the Justice Department and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
The Post cited a 2008 example of the interception of a "large number" of calls placed from Washington when a programming error confused U.S. area code 202 for 20, the international dialing code for Egypt, according to a "quality assurance" review that was not distributed to the NSA's oversight staff.
In another case, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which has authority over some NSA operations, did not learn about a new collection method until it had been in operation for many months. The court ruled it unconstitutional.
The NSA audit obtained by the Post dated May 2012, counted 2,776 incidents in the preceding 12 months of unauthorized collection, storage, access to or distribution of legally protected communications. Most were unintended. Many involved failures of due diligence or violations of standard operating procedure. The most serious incidents included a violation of a court order and unauthorized use of data about more than 3,000 Americans and green-card holders.
In an emailed statement to The Associated Press late Thursday, John DeLong, NSA's director of compliance, said, "We want people to report if they have made a mistake or even if they believe that an NSA activity is not consistent with the rules. NSA, like other regulated organizations, also has a `hotline' for people to report -- and no adverse action or reprisal can be taken for the simple act of reporting. We take each report seriously, investigate the matter, address the issue, constantly look for trends and address them as well -- all as a part of NSA's internal oversight and compliance efforts. What's more, we keep our overseers informed through both immediate reporting and periodic reporting."
********************************************************************************
N.S.A. Often Broke Rules on Privacy, Audit Shows
By CHARLIE SAVAGE
Published: August 16, 2013
WASHINGTON — The National Security Agency
violated privacy rules protecting the communications of Americans and
others on domestic soil 2,776 times over a one-year period, according to an internal audit leaked by the former N.S.A. contractor Edward J. Snowden and made public on Thursday night.
The largest number of episodes — 1,904 — appeared to be “roamers,” in which a foreigner whose cellphone was being wiretapped without a warrant came to the United States, where individual warrants are required. A spike in such problems in a single quarter, the report said, could be because of Chinese citizens visiting friends and family for the Chinese Lunar New Year holiday.
“Roamer incidents are largely unpreventable, even with good target awareness and traffic review, since target travel activities are often unannounced and not easily predicted,” the report says.
The report and several other documents leaked by Mr. Snowden were published by The Washington Post. They shed new light on the intrusions into Americans’ privacy that N.S.A. surveillance can entail, and how the agency handles violations of its rules.
Mr. Snowden, who was recently granted temporary asylum in Russia, is believed to have given the documents to The Post months ago.
The Post, which did not publish every document its accompanying article relied upon, cited other problems as well. In one case in 2008 that was not reported to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court or Congress, it said, the system collected metadata logs about a “large number” of calls dialed from Washington – something it was already doing through a different program – because of a programming error mixing up the district’s area code, 202, with the international dialing code of Egypt, 20.
Read More Here
********************************************************************************
No comments:
Post a Comment
Hello and thank you for visiting my blog. Please share your thoughts and leave a comment :)