UN Panel implicates Syrian Rebels in Chemical weapons attacks . While Warmongers cheer the Obama Administration towards War.

Ben Barrack·

Published on Aug 26, 2013

In this report from June of this year, it's learned that a UN panel compiled evidence that chemical weapons were not used by Syria's Assad but instead by the Muslim Brotherhood rebels.

*******************************************************

'US would use any UN chemical weapons report to justify attack on Syria'

Published on Aug 27, 2013

International pressure has been building for a military strike on Syria in the wake of an alleged chemical weapons attack in a Damascus suburb. The West has laid the blame at the feet of President Assad, as UN inspectors probe the site of the attack. RT's contributor Afshin Rattansi thinks that whatever UN chemical weapons report would be, US would construe it in a way to justify attack on Syria.
RT LIVE http://rt.com/on-air


*******************************************************

"Cruise Missile ATTACK Is A GREAT Option! Assad Air Force Is Prime To Be Taken Down In ONE Strike!"

MOXNEWSd0tC0M

Published on Aug 27, 2013

August 27, 2013 CNN
http://MOXNews.com

*******************************************************

Tuesday, August 27, 2013

Lieberman, Rove, Kristol Urge Obama to Attack Syria

In an open letter to President Obama a group warmongers have urged  President Obama to impose "meaningful consequences on the Assad regime."
"At a minimum, the United States, along with willing allies and partners, should use standoff weapons and airpower to target the Syrian dictatorship’s military units that were involved in the recent large-scale use of chemical weapons.  It should also provide vetted moderate elements of Syria’s armed opposition with the military support required to identify and strike regime units armed with chemical weapons," says the letter.
Below is the full letter and list of signatories.
Dear Mr. President,
Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad has once again violated your red line, using chemical weapons to kill as many as 1,400 people in the suburbs of Damascus.  You have said that large-scale use of chemical weapons in Syria would implicate “core national interests,” including “making sure that weapons of mass destruction are not proliferating, as well as needing to protect our allies [and] our bases in the region.”  The world—including Iran, North Korea, and other potential aggressors who seek or possess weapons of mass of destruction—is now watching to see how you respond.
We urge you to respond decisively by imposing meaningful consequences on the Assad regime.  At a minimum, the United States, along with willing allies and partners, should use standoff weapons and airpower to target the Syrian dictatorship’s military units that were involved in the recent large-scale use of chemical weapons.  It should also provide vetted moderate elements of Syria’s armed opposition with the military support required to identify and strike regime units armed with chemical weapons.
Moreover, the United States and other willing nations should consider direct military strikes against the pillars of the Assad regime.  The objectives should be not only to ensure that Assad’s chemical weapons no longer threaten America, our allies in the region or the Syrian people, but also to deter or destroy the Assad regime’s airpower and other conventional military means of committing atrocities against civilian non-combatants.  At the same time, the United States should accelerate efforts to vet, train, and arm moderate elements of Syria’s armed opposition, with the goal of empowering them to prevail against both the Assad regime and the growing presence of Al Qaeda-affiliated and other extremist rebel factions in the country.
Left unanswered, the Assad regime’s mounting attacks with chemical weapons will show the world that America’s red lines are only empty threats.  It is a dangerous and destabilizing message that will surely come to haunt us—one that will certainly embolden Iran’s efforts to develop nuclear weapons capability despite your repeated warnings that doing so is unacceptable.  It is therefore time for the United States to take meaningful and decisive actions to stem the Assad regime’s relentless aggression, and help shape and influence the foundations for the post-Assad Syria that you have said is inevitable.
Sincerely,
Ammar Abdulhamid
Elliott Abrams
Dr. Fouad Ajami
Dr. Michael Auslin
Gary Bauer
Paul Berman
Max Boot
Ellen Bork
Ambassador L. Paul Bremer
Matthew R. J. Brodsky
Dr. Eliot A. Cohen
Senator Norm Coleman
Ambassador William Courtney
Seth Cropsey
James S. Denton
Paula A. DeSutter
Larry Diamond

Read More Here


 *******************************************************

Related articles

• Assad says Syrian troops did not use chemical weapons
• Think Twice Before Bombing Syria
• Is It Possible The Syrian Rebels (Not Assad) Used Chemical Weapons?
• Syrian Chemical Weapons Attack Work of Obama Allies?
• Biden: "No doubt" Assad responsible for Syria chemical weapons attack
• Obama's Three Options in Syria
• Franken, Klobuchar: Chemical weapons use must have consequences
• White House rules out 'regime change' among options for Syria
• !!!!! MUST WATCH: Leaked Documents: U.S. Framed Syria in Chemical Weapons Attack
• US Planned Chemical Weapons False Flag Attack for Syria, According to Leaked Documents