Wednesday, July 31, 2013

Egypt’s interim government was accused of attempting to return the country to the Mubarak era after the country’s interior ministry announced the resurrection of several controversial police units

Egypt restores feared secret police units

Military-backed government seems to have no intent of reforming practices that characterised both Mubarak and Morsi eras
Qur'ans
Qur'ans belonging to supporters of Egypt's ousted President Mohamed Morsi are seen in a tent at Nasr City. Photograph: Manu Brabo/AP
Egypt's interim government was accused of attempting to return the country to the Mubarak era on Monday, after the country's interior ministry announced the resurrection of several controversial police units that were nominally shut down following the country's 2011 uprising and the interim prime minister was given the power to place the country in a state of emergency.
Egypt's state security investigations service, Mabahith Amn ad-Dawla, a wing of the police force under President Mubarak, and a symbol of police oppression, was supposedly closed in March 2011 – along with several units within it that investigated Islamist groups and opposition activists. The new national security service (NSS) was established in its place.
But following Saturday's massacre of at least 83 Islamists, interior minister Mohamed Ibrahim announced the reinstatement of the units, and referred to the NSS by its old name. He added that experienced police officers sidelined in the aftermath of the 2011 revolution would be brought back into the fold.
Police brutality also went unchecked under Morsi, who regularly failed to condemn police abuses committed during his presidency. But Ibrahim's move suggests he is using the ousting of Morsi – and a corresponding upsurge in support for Egypt's police – as a smokescreen for the re-introduction of pre-2011 practices.
Ibrahim's announcement came hours before Egypt's interim prime minister was given the power to place the country in a state of emergency – a hallmark of Egypt under Mubarak.
"It's a return to the Mubarak era," said Aida Seif el-Dawla, a prominent Egyptian human rights activist, and the executive director of a group that frequently supports victims of police brutality, the Nadeem centre for rehabilitation of victims of violence and torture.
"These units committed the most atrocious human rights violations," said el-Dawla. "Incommunicado detentions, killings outside the law. Those were the [units] that managed the killing of Islamists during the 1990s. It's an ugly authority that has never been brought to justice."


Read More Here


Enhanced by Zemanta

IRS Union Employees are not happy that HR 1780 would require ALL Federal employees to participate in the Obamacare program they will be enforcing. They want to be exempt.

CNS NEWS .com

IRS Employees' Union Urges Members to Oppose Obamacare--For Themselves

July 26, 2013 - 1:12 PM

NTEU members
NTEU members (AP photo)
(CNSNews.com) – The National Treasury Employees Union, which represents Internal Revenue Service employees, is urging its members to oppose legislation that would force federal employees off their government healthcare plans and onto the state and national healthcare exchanges established under Obamacare.
Members of Congress and their staffers are already required to participate in the exchanges, which will go into effect next October 1st under the Affordable Care Act.
However, a bill (HR 1780) introduced in April by Rep. David Camp (R–Mich.) would extend that requirement to all federal employees, an idea that does not sit well with the union.
So NTEU is strongly urging its members –  including the Internal Revenue Service agents tasked with implementing Obamacare – to oppose Camp’s legislation, which would compel them to personally participate in the same healthcare program they will be enforcing.
On the NTEU website, union members are urged to email their congressman and senators, asking them to oppose H.R.1780. NTEU provides a sample letter that members can simply sign and send, or rewrite it as they wish:


Read More Here


**************************************************************

Sen. Sessions: We Should Do Everything We Can to Undo Obamacare

July 26, 2013 - 10:23 AM

(CNSNews.com) - Senator Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) said that members of Congress must do everything in their power to block the individual mandate in President Obama's signature health care law from going into effect in 2014.
On Capitol Hill Wednesday, CNSNews.com asked Sessions: "Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah) wants the upcoming continuing resolution (CR)  to include language that prohibits funding for the individual mandate in Obamacare because the [similar] mandate for big corporations has already been postponed. Do you agree with Senator Lee and do you think funding for the individual mandate should be halted?"
"We should do everything that we can to block that... (to) undo Obamacare,” Sessions responded.
Lee has spent the last two weeks stating that he will refuse to vote for any continuing resolution that continues to fund the federal government past September 30th if it includes funding for the individual mandate component of Obamacare.
“The remedy is for Congress to refuse to fund the implementation of the program that the president insists is not ready to be implemented,” said Lee in an interview with CNSNews.com on July 11.
On July 2, the Obama administration announced that the section of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act that requires employers to provide health insurance to employees would be postponed a year until 2015.  But the individual mandate is still slated to go into effect in 2014.
“Right now, this is the last stop before Obamacare fully kicks in on Jan. 1 of next year, for us to refuse to fund it." Lee told FOX News Monday.


Read More Here


**************************************************************
Enhanced by Zemanta

One in three moms has struggled to pay for diapers, according to a new study.

'It made me feel ashamed': Poor moms' anguish over diaper costs

July 29, 2013 at 12:02 AM ET

** FILE ** In a file photo a shopper and her child look at diapers at a Little Rock, Ark., Wal-Mart Super Center store Wednesday, Aug. 24, 2004. Kimbe...
DANNY JOHNSTON / AP file
 
One in three moms has struggled to pay for diapers, according to a new study. Eight percent say they've tried to make them last longer by leaving a wet diaper on their child or trying to clean and reuse it.
As a single working mom with no college education, Jessica Aragon was once so desperate for diapers she considered stealing them. Back then, she remembers, she barely had enough money to cover childcare and rent at the end of the month, let alone pay for baby wipes and diapers for her 1-year-old.
“For other needs, like food, you could go to a food bank,” Aragon, now 33, says. “But there was no help for things like diapers. I had to borrow money and sell everything I had -- the DVD player, the TV – to get money for diapers.”
Sometimes she’d just have to skip a change and leave her baby wet so she’d have enough diapers to make it through the week. "It made me feel ashamed, like I was less of a mother,” the Columbus, Ohio, mom says.
As it turns out, Aragon is far from alone. Thirty percent of the women interviewed for a new study published Monday in the journal Pediatrics said they'd experienced a time when they could not afford to buy the diapers their kids needed. And a full 8 percent reported that they would “stretch” the diapers they had when their supply was running short by leaving a wet diaper on their child or partially cleaning the diaper and reusing it.
In fact, worry over how to pay for diapers is now among the top stressors for low-income parents, next to concerns about food and housing, researchers say.
The concerns come as Americans continue to grapple with the effects of the deep recession and weak recovery, which has left many families scrambling to keep up with rising bills. The nation’s median household income declined to $50,054 in 2011. After adjusting for inflation, that’s nearly 9 percent lower than the peak in 1999.
The problem is especially acute for single moms, who tend to already be among the most economically vulnerable. The overall poverty rate was 15 percent in 2011, according to the most recent data available from the U.S. Census Bureau. But nearly 41 percent of female-headed households with children under age 18 were living below the poverty line, according to the Census Bureau. That compares to a little less than 9 percent of married-couple families with kids under 18.
The high percentage of moms who worry about affording diapers came as a surprise to the study’s lead author, Megan Smith, an assistant professor of psychiatry, child study and public health at the Yale School of Medicine.
Smith started out looking into stressors that impact the mental health of moms and especially the factors that affected their ability to bond with their kids. The more moms she talked to the more she realized that a big stressor for some of them was the inability to pay for diapers.
“Some were taking off their kids’ diapers and scraping off the contents and then putting them back on the child,” Smith says. “While that has an incredible impact on the health of the child in terms of urinary tract infections and rashes, it also impacts the self-esteem of the mom.”
Another big surprise to Smith: there are few federal dollars to pay for diapers. Neither WIC nor SNAP provide for diaper purchases.
For the study, Smith and her colleagues interviewed 877 pregnant and parenting women of various income levels in New Haven, Conn. The researchers located the women through health care providers and also by conducting outreach in various spots around the city, including schools, beauty shops, bus stops, playgrounds and grocery stores.
The women were asked questions about their basic demographics, mental health, substance use, trauma histories, health care and social service use, and basic needs -- such as food, housing, and diapers.
While the new study focused on mothers in New Haven, Conn., experts note that many families across the country struggle to afford diapers. "The results of the study support the reports I hear every day from diaper bank leaders across the country," says Joanne Goldblum, a study co-author and executive director of the National Diaper Bank Network, which helps provide diapers to low-income families.


Read More Here


Enhanced by Zemanta

Chuckle Factor : Drone Spotting App







Published on Jun 18, 2013
 
The new drone spotting app can find even the most rare and exotic drones!
Scene taken from "JoyCamp - Operation Paul Revere Infowars.com Contest Entry" Watch the full episode here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhGahvyDD6s


JoyCamp - Operation Paul Revere InfoWars.com Contest




Published on Apr 29, 2013
Comedy Awareness

http://www.youtube.com/thejoycamp

Alex Jones Infowars Operation Paul Revere Contest
http://www.infowars.com

Subscribe to JoyCamp: http://www.youtube.com/thejoycamp
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thejoycamp
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/TheJoyCamp

JoyCamp is:
Benny Wills
Kevin Kostelnik
Nik Kazoura
Michael Kostelnik
Andrew Delman

Written by:
Benny Wills & Kevin Kostelnik
With Nik Kazoura, Michael Kostelnik, Andrew Delman
"Oil & Slave Labor" co-written by Liam Scheff

Directed by:
Benny Wills, Kevin Kostelnik, Nik Kazoura, Michael Kostelnik

Edited by:
Kevin Kostelnik & Nik Kazoura

Filmed by:
Michael Kostelnik

Also Featuring:
Rebecca Kostelnik
Carrie Kostelnik
Garrett Mendez
Sage Howard
Sarah Asaly
Hailey Schiller
Nich Kauffman
Lamonte Tales Goode

Original Music:
"JoyCamp Intro Theme Song" by Walker Gibson
"Benny Bounce" segue & "Brand New Man" outro songs by Sean Hennesy
"By Cia" jingle by Walker & Lindsay Gibson

All other music purchased on audiojungle.net
License certificates available upon request.

Special Thanks to:
Alex Jones
Infowars
Liam Scheff
Ed Brotherton
Tony Carrillo
Camron Wiltshire
Mike Paczensy
Sam Comen
The Green Beautiful
Paul Revere
Our family, friends, and supporters.

"If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you."
-Oscar Wilde
Enhanced by Zemanta

Cyprus 37.5% Depositor Haircut Upgraded To 47.5% Brazilian Wax


 photo AngelaMerkelandBrazilianWax_zpsf46e9b3d.jpg
Copyright  :  Desert Rose Creations / Family Survival Protocol  2013

****************************************************************************************

ZeroHedge






Once upon a time (in April), a few weeks after reversing its initial disastrous decision to haircut all deposits (including insured ones) the Troika slammed large Cypriot depositors (read evil Russian oligarchs) with a "bail-in" template, soon coming to all insolvent European nations, that included not only a forced assignment of equity in broke Cypriot banks, but far more importantly a haircut that amounted to 37.5% of deposits over €100,000. Since then a few things have happened in Cyprus, neither of them good, i.e., an a record collapse in bank deposits despite capital controls and a record crash in the local real estate market.
The confluence of both these events meant that as bank liabilities shrank (deposits), asset fair values (home mortgages) collapsed even faster. Which, as we warned in March, would entail bigger and more aggressive deposit haircuts, and ultimately: another bailout of Cyprus (something the president floated but promptly denied upon rejection by Merkel ahead of her September elections). Today, we learn that while the inevitable next bailout of Cyprus is still on the table, the deposit "haircut" just upgraded to an aggravated Brazilian wax, as the 37.5% gentle trim initially proposed was revised to 47.5%.
InCyprus reports:


The Finance Ministry and the Troika appeared to be converging on an agreement on the haircut of uninsured deposits over 100,000 euros in the Bank of Cyprus at 47.5%.
After marathon negotiations at the Finance Ministry further talks continued at Central Bank until late into the night with Finance Minister Haris Georgiades focussing on the technical issues that had arisen.


Read More Here


Enhanced by Zemanta