In
an interview, German Interior Minister Hans-Peter Friedrich discusses
his confidence in the United States and its claims it is not conducting
mass spying on Europe, concerns about Facebook and a determination to
continue the fight against terrorism.
SPIEGEL: Minister Friedrich, can we take a quick look at your mobile phone?
Friedrich: All of them?
SPIEGEL: How many do you have?
Friedrich:
Three. One phone on which conversations are encrypted, and one that has
special security features. I use the third phone, which I have here in
my pocket and which has for example newspaper apps installed, to go on
the Internet.
SPIEGEL: Is that phone bug proof?
Friedrich: No. It's an ordinary mobile phone.
SPIEGEL:
After coming into office, you banned all BlackBerrys and smartphones
from your staff meetings, because of the risk of information "getting
into the wrong hands and ears," as was said at the time. From today's
perspective, that sounds almost prophetic.
Friedrich: It
wasn't prophetic, just realistic. The networks are relatively open, and
you can penetrate them with ordinary tools, which crime organizations
and criminals certainly use to their advantage. That's why we only use
official devices for official matters.
SPIEGEL: Is it just criminal organizations that are getting in, or also intelligence services?
Friedrich: Intelligence services, too, if you insist. There are, after all, plenty of those in the world.
SPIEGEL: Do you think it's reasonable that citizens must assume that their telephone conversations are being wiretapped and their
emails read?
Friedrich:
As a rule, citizens can assume that their telephone conversations are
not being wiretapped, at least not by Western intelligence agencies.
But, once again, other groups, such as criminal organizations, do have
the technical means to listen in on phone conversations and read emails.
In other words, you have to take extra steps if you want to communicate
securely, such as using encryption technologies. You can compare it to
sending a postcard when you're on vacation. Everyone knows that others
can read it. Letters are more secure.
SPIEGEL: In the case
of telephone conversations, we had assumed until now that they were
constitutionally protected and took place within a confidential
framework. Since the leaks by Edward Snowden, a former employee of the
US's NSA intelligence agency, we have to assume that we are being
systematically wiretapped and skimmed. Does that worry you?
Friedrich: So far, we have no indications that the American and British agencies, the
NSA and GCHQ, are wiretapping phones in Germany.
SPIEGEL: According to the
Snowden documents,
GCHQ hacks into trans-Atlantic data communications passing through the
TAT-14 fiber optic cable and stores the content for several days. A
large share of German telephone conversations and emails abroad pass
through this cable. Don't you have a problem with that?
Friedrich:
Communications pass through fiber optic cables worldwide. Intelligence
services also tap into those cables to filter the flow of data. When the
electronic filter signals that someone is dialing the telephone number
of a presumed terrorist, perhaps in Pakistan or in Yemen, this
information may be the first step toward preventing a possible terrorist
attack, which could cost many lives. One thing is clear: This does not
affect ordinary citizens. We are talking about strategic
telecommunications reconnaissance, which is primarily the evaluation of
connection data, not the content of conversations. When you make a phone
call, the conversation doesn't just pass through one fiber optic cable,
but in several packets and through various connections.
Read More Here
