The New York Times
Michael Ciaglo/The Colorado Springs Gazette, via Associated Press
By ERICA GOODE
Published: December 15, 2013
GREELEY, Colo. — When Sheriff John Cooke of Weld County explains in
speeches why he is not enforcing the state’s new gun laws, he holds up
two 30-round magazines. One, he says, he had before July 1, when the law
banning the possession, sale or transfer of the large-capacity
magazines went into effect. The other, he “maybe” obtained afterward.
He shuffles the magazines, which look identical, and then challenges the audience to tell the difference.
“How is a deputy or an officer supposed to know which is which?” he asks.
Colorado’s package of gun laws, enacted this year after mass shootings
in Aurora, Colo., and Newtown, Conn., has been hailed as a victory by
advocates of gun control. But if Sheriff Cooke and a majority of the
other county sheriffs in Colorado offer any indication, the new laws —
which mandate background checks for private gun transfers and outlaw
magazines over 15 rounds — may prove nearly irrelevant across much of
the state’s rural regions.
Some sheriffs, like Sheriff Cooke, are refusing to enforce the laws,
saying that they are too vague and violate Second Amendment rights. Many
more say that enforcement will be “a very low priority,” as several
sheriffs put it. All but seven of the 62 elected sheriffs in Colorado
signed on in May to a federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality
of the statutes.
The resistance of sheriffs in Colorado is playing out in other states,
raising questions about whether tougher rules passed since Newtown will
have a muted effect in parts of the American heartland, where gun
ownership is common and grass-roots opposition to tighter restrictions
is high.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Hello and thank you for visiting my blog. Please share your thoughts and leave a comment :)