A
conscientious father in Nevada received shocking news when he requested
to see the permanent records of his four children from state education
officials: His request would cost $10,194.
John Eppolito, the
father, was concerned about a recent decision in Nevada to join a
multi-state consortium that would share student data.
Fox News
explains, "Nevada has spent an estimated $10 million in its
seven-year-old System of Accountability Information in Nevada, known as
SAIN. Data from county school systems is uploaded nightly to a state
database, and, under the new arrangement, potentially shared with other
counties and states."
Eppolito was interested in
accessing his children’s records in order to learn what information had
been compiled on his children. It was then that he learned that he would
have to pay significant fees as well as special programming costs to
run a report of that kind.
The total, Eppolito was told, would come to $10,194.
“The
problem is that I can’t stop them from collecting the data,” said
Eppolito. “I just wanted to know what it was. It almost seems
impossible. Certainly $10,000 is enough reason to prevent a parent from
getting the data.”
Department of Public Information officer Judy
Osgood attempted to explain the reason for such a high price: “Please
understand that the primary purpose of the Department of Education’s
database it to support required state and federal reporting, funding of
local education agencies, education accountability, and public
reporting,” Osgood states. “The system currently is not capable of
responding to the type of individual student data request you have
presented.”
Eppolito was not satisfied with the response. “This data is for everyone except the parents. It’s wrong,” he asserts.
The
federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) allows
parents to view their children’s records and permits small fees to be
issued in order to access those records. Ironically, under the act, the
fees are not supposed to be so substantial that they ultimately prevent
parents from obtaining them.
“Unless the imposition of a fee
effectively prevents a parent or eligible student from exercising the
right to inspect and review the student's education records, an
educational agency or institution may charge a fee for a copy of an
education record which is made for the parent or eligible student,”
reads a section of the act. “An educational agency or institution may
not charge a fee to search for or to retrieve the education records of a
student.”
According to the regulations, the above criteria apply to “any state educational agency and its components.”
The state, by requiring the fee of over $10,000, appears to be acting in violation of FERPA.
“They
are supposed to provide [parents] the opportunity to inspect and review
[records] upon request,” explained one official at the Family Policy
Compliance Office (FCPO), the federal agency over FERPA. “There
shouldn’t be a fee for inspecting and reviewing the records.”
But
Osgood does not view it that way. “NDE does provide free access to
education records,” she said. “SAIN was not designed for student-level
inspection. Our understanding of FERPA is that this level of inspection
applies to the LEA [local education authority—i.e., school district] and
school.”
Read More Here
Pages
- Home
- Thank You
- Assassination / Attempted Assassination
- Corporate Assault on Our Lives and Our Health / Corporatocracy
- Disaster Preparedness - Food Storage - Survival - Sustainability - Self Sufficiency
- Economic News
- Elite / NWO Agenda
- Government Greed and Depravity / The Fleecing of a Nation
- Holding Government Accountable
- Legislation / Executive Orders / Litigation / The American Constitution
- Main Stream Media Manipulation/Lies - Conspiracy Theories - Alternative Media
- Parody / Satire
- Politics / Interventionist Foreign Policy/ Socio-Economic Ramifications of Government Overreach
- Signs of the Times
- Wars and Rumors of War / National Defense / Terror Plots - Suspects / Organized Crime
- Whistleblowers
- Family Survival Protocol - Affiliate Sites
Showing posts with label freedom of information. Show all posts
Showing posts with label freedom of information. Show all posts
Thursday, December 17, 2015
The Story of Aaron Swartz Full Documentary : In case you missed it ... An American Government Agenda and a Young Man's Ideal we must never forget
Labels:
Aaron Swartz,
Accountability,
ACTA,
censorship,
freedom of information,
Government Overreach,
indoctrination,
Internet Neutrality,
open access,
oppression,
PIPA,
Politics,
SOPA,
US government
Tuesday, November 24, 2015
EFSA Findings : Glyphosate by itself doesn’t cause cancer. But products like Monsanto’s Roundup, which contain glyphosate and other additives are another story.
Organic Consumers Association
Campaigning for health, justice, sustainability, peace, and democracy
Monsanto’s Roundup: The Whole Toxic Enchilada
November 19, 2015
Last week, while we waited for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to announce whether or not the agency will give Monsanto’s Roundup a free pass by green lighting the use of glyphosate for another 15 years, the EPA’s counterpart in the EU made its own big announcement.
Glyphosate is “unlikely to cause cancer” said the authors of the new report by the European Union Food Safety Authority (EFSA).
That headline, music to Monsanto’s ears, seemed to fly in the face of the findings published earlier this year by the World Health Organization (WHO). After extensive review of the evidence, all 17 of WHO’s leading cancer experts said glyphosate is a “probable human carcinogen?”
Sustainable Pulse (SP), publisher of global news on GMOs and other food-related issues, quickly reported the glaring omission made by the majority of news sources reporting on EFSA’s findings.
According to SP, what EFSA really concluded is this: Glyphosate by itself doesn’t cause cancer. But products like Monsanto’s Roundup, which contain glyphosate and other additives and chemicals that are essential to making the herbicide work? That’s another, or in this case, the rest of the story.
Read More Here
Labels:
Accountability,
Bioethics,
Carcinogens,
EPA,
EU,
freedom of information,
Glyphosate,
greed,
herbicides,
Human Experimentation,
Medical Research,
Monsanto,
Pesticides,
Poisons in Our Foods,
Politics,
US,
WHO
Friday, October 16, 2015
Fury towards Erdogan intensifies after Ankara attack. Thousands rally.
Ankara
(AFP) - Thousands of mourners filled the streets of Ankara Sunday and
vented their anger at President Recep Tayyip Erdogan after 97 people
were killed in the country's worst-ever terror attack, while the
government raced to identify the two male suicide bombers it blamed for
the bloodshed.
Flags flew at half-mast across Turkey on the first
of three days of national mourning declared by Prime Minister Ahmet
Davutoglu, as questions grew over who could have ordered Saturday's
bombings on a peace rally in Ankara.
Turkey's
pro-Kurdish Peoples' Democratic Party (HDP), one of the groups that had
organised the rally, said it believes the death toll now stands at 128.
With the country on edge, Erdogan issued a statement condemning the "heinous" bombings and cancelled a planned visit to Turkmenistan but he has yet to speak in public since the attack that shocked the nation.
On Sunday, thousands of demonstrators thronged central Ankara's Sihhiye Square, close to the blast site by the city's main train station, to pay tribute to the victims.
View gallery
ATTENTION EDITORS - VISUAL COVERAGE OF SCENES OF INJURY OR DEATH
An injured man hugs an injured woma …
Many
of those gathered accused the government of failing to provide security
at the ill-fated rally and several anti-government demonstrators
shouted "Erdogan murderer" and "government resign!"
"I am a
mother, I'm worried about my grandchildren, I am marching for our
children, for our future. Each time there are people dead, I also die a
little," said Zahide, who like many others carried a pink carnation
flower to commemorate the victims.The premier's office said 97 people were killed when the bombs exploded just after 10:00 am (0700 GMT) as leftist and pro-Kurdish activists assembled for the rally.
It added that 507 people were wounded, with 160 still in hospital and 65 in intensive care in 19 hospitals.
An
AFP correspondent said the scene of the blast was littered with ball
bearings, indicating the explosions were intended to cause maximum
damage.
View gallery

A family mourns in an area allocated for families of victims of Saturday's twin blasts in Ankara …
- 'Topple the dictator' -
In
an emotional address to the mourners in Ankara, the HDP's leader
Selahattin Demirtas said that rather than seeking revenge people should
aim to end Erdogan's rule, starting with the upcoming legislative
elections.
....................................................................................................
Fury towards Erdogan intensifies after Ankara attack
Ankara
(AFP) - Anger towards President Recep Tayyip Erdogan over Turkey's
worst-ever terrorist attack intensified as authorities raced to identify
the two male suicide bombers it blamed for the bloodshed.
The streets of Ankara filled with anti-government and pro-Kurdish protesters accusing the government of responsibility for the blast that ripped through a peace rally a day earlier, with several shouting "Erdogan murderer" and "government resign!"
The streets of Ankara filled with anti-government and pro-Kurdish protesters accusing the government of responsibility for the blast that ripped through a peace rally a day earlier, with several shouting "Erdogan murderer" and "government resign!"
In Istanbul on Saturday, a 10,000-strong crowd accused the government of failing to protect citizens by providing security for the event, carrying placards reading "the state is a killer" and "we know the murderers".
As
tributes poured in from world leaders, Selahattin Demirtas, leader of
the Peoples' Democratic Party (HDP), was cited as saying "State attacked
the people. Condolences recipient should be the people not Erdogan" on
the party's Twitter account.
In
an emotional address to mourners in Ankara, Demirtas said that citizens
should aim to end Erdogan's rule, starting with the upcoming
legislative elections.
"We
are not going to act out of revenge and hatred. But we are going to ask
for (people to be held to) account," he added, saying the vote would be
part of a process to "topple the dictator."
View gallery

Relatives mourn near the grave of a victim of the twin bombings in Ankara, during the funeral in Ist …
The
party believes the death toll now stands at 128, higher than the 97
people the prime minister's office said were killed when the bombs
exploded on Saturday morning as leftist and pro-Kurdish activists
assembled by the city's main train station.
The official toll also said 507 people were wounded, with 160 still in hospital and 65 in intensive care in 19 hospitals
.
- Erdogan silent
Tuesday, September 29, 2015
Former Cop Gets Two Years in Prison for Pointing Out Flaws in Lie Detector Tests
September 25, 2015
By John Vibes69-year-old Douglas G. Williams of Norman, Oklahoma was sentenced to two years in prison this week for running a website that pointed out the flaws in lie detector tests. Williams is a former detective for the Oklahoma City Police Department and throughout the course of his career he administered thousands of polygraph tests for his own police department, as well as other agencies like the FBI and the Secret Service. Through his experience, Williams learned that a polygraph is not a valid way of truly figuring out whether or not someone is lying. In 1979, he invented “the sting technique,” which polygraph experts now refer to as “countermeasures.”
He wrote the first manual teaching people how to pass a polygraph test, which was initially published in 1979 and, according to him, was one of the very first e-books available on the Internet.
The U.S. Department Of Justice issued a
press release this week stating that they planted federal agents to pose
as customers and entrap Williams in schemes to help the agents cheat on
polygraph tests.
According to the press release:According to admissions made in connection with his plea, Williams owned and operated Polygraph.com, an Internet-based business through which he trained people how to conceal misconduct and other disqualifying information when submitting to polygraph examinations in connection with federal employment suitability assessments, background investigations, internal agency investigations and other proceedings. In particular, Williams admitted that he trained an individual posing as a federal law enforcement officer to lie and conceal involvement in criminal activity from an internal agency investigation. Williams also admitted to training a second individual, posing as an applicant seeking federal employment, to lie and conceal crimes in a pre-employment polygraph examination. Williams also admitted to instructing the individuals to deny receiving his polygraph training.Read More Here
Thursday, May 15, 2014
Nevada Father told his request for his childrens student records will cost him over $10,000
Tuesday, 13 May 2014 16:44
Nevada Tells Father: Over $10K to Access Kids' School Records
Written by Raven ClaboughRelated articles
Friday, April 11, 2014
Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act : A proposed new federal law would outlaw state-enacted GMO labeling laws.
Consumer alert: GMO labeling to be outlawed by 'Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act' introduced today in Congress

Thursday, April 10, 2014
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com (See all articles...)
(NaturalNews) A proposed new federal law just introduced by Rep. G.K. Butterfield (a Democrat) and Rep. Mike Pompeo (a Republican) would outlaw state-enacted GMO labeling laws. The new law, ridiculously called the Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act, is actually an last-ditch, desperate effort by the biotech industry and the GMA to forever bury the truth about GMOs so that consumers don't know they're eating poison.
According to mainstream media reports (1), the bill would require the FDA to mandate GMO labeling only if those foods "are found to be unsafe or materially different from foods produced without biotech ingredients."
Because the FDA and USDA have already decided, against all scientific evidence, that GMOs are "safe" and "not materially different" from other foods, this requirement is nothing but sheer sleight of hand and a pandering to idiocy. In truth, this new bill, if passed into law, would allow food companies to permanently and insidiously hide GMOs in all their products forever, nullifying the numerous state-based GMO labeling laws which are on the verge of passing.
The Environmental Working Group calls this proposed new law the "DARK Act" (Denying Americans the Right to Know), saying:
After two states have passed GE labeling bills and more than 30 others are poised to consider similar labeling bills and ballot initiatives, the food and biotech industry have goat-roped some members of Congress into introducing legislation to block state GE labeling laws.
Push for GMOs run by criminally-minded organizations
GMOs have already been restricted or banned in over 60 countries (2), and Americans are very close to achieving victory in state-based GMO labeling campaigns. The very idea that American consumers might find out they've been eating GMO poisons in most of their favorite foods is so horrifying to the biotech industry (and the processed food front groups) that its enforcers are now seeking this "nuclear option" to legally deceive consumers about GMOs with the complicity of the FDA.Read More Here
.....
U.S. bill seeks to block mandatory GMO food labeling by states
(Reuters) - A Republican congressman from Kansas introduced legislation on Wednesday that would nullify efforts in multiple states to require labeling of genetically modified foodsThe bill, dubbed the "Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act" was drafted by U.S. Rep. Mike Pompeo from Kansas, and is aimed at overriding bills in roughly two dozen states that would require foods made with genetically engineered crops to be labeled as such.
The bill specifically prohibits any mandatory labeling of foods developed using bioengineering.
"We've got a number of states that are attempting to put together a patchwork quilt of food labeling requirements with respect to genetic modification of foods," said Pompeo. "That makes it enormously difficult to operate a food system. Some of the campaigns in some of these states aren't really to inform consumers but rather aimed at scaring them. What this bill attempts to do is set a standard."
Consumer groups have been arguing for labeling because of questions they have both about the safety for human health and the environmental impacts of genetically modified foods, also called GMOs.
Ballot measures in California in 2012 and last year in Washington state narrowly lost after GMO crop developers, including Monsanto Co., and members of the Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA) poured millions into campaigns to defeat the measures.
The companies say the crops are safe and cite many scientific studies back those claims. Pompeo on Wednesday reiterated those claims, stating GMOS are safe and "equally healthy" and no labeling is needed.
"It has to date made food safer and more abundant," said Pompeo. "It has been an enormous boon to all of humanity."
But there are also many scientific studies showing links to human and animal health problems, and many indicating environmental damage related to GMO crops.
Read More Here
.....
Congress considers blocking GMO food labeling
Published time: April 09, 2014 20:10
Edited time: April 10, 2014 11:01
Edited time: April 10, 2014 11:01

AFP Photo / Robyn Beck
According to Reuters, US Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-Kan.) introduced the legislation on Wednesday, which is intended to head off bills in about 24 states that would require companies to inform customers when their food is produced using genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Titled the “Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act,” the proposal would forbid states from enacting such proposals.
"We've got a number of states that are attempting to put together a patchwork quilt of food labeling requirements with respect to genetic modification of foods," Pompeo told Reuters. "That makes it enormously difficult to operate a food system. Some of the campaigns in some of these states aren't really to inform consumers but rather aimed at scaring them. What this bill attempts to do is set a standard."
Supporters of GMO labeling argue that modified ingredients pose a threat to human health, and that as a result they should be clearly labeled in the marketplace so that consumers can make informed decisions. In addition to health concerns, they also point to the negative environmental consequences that could arise from widespread GMO use, since millions of acres of farmland and weeds are developing resistances to the pesticides used.
Opponents, however, point to their own studies, showing that GMO crops are safe and therefore do not need to be labeled differently than other products.
Read More Here
.....
Related articles
Sunday, April 6, 2014
Koch ally to introduce Monsanto-backed bill to bar state GMO labeling laws
Published time: April 04, 2014 04:00

(AFP Photo / Dieter Nagl)
Pompeo will offer the bill in the US House before Congress leaves for Easter recess later this month, The Hill newspaper reported, citing industry sources. Politico also reported on the impending proposal. Pompeo’s office would not comment on the congressman’s intentions for a labeling restriction.
The bill includes a “prohibition against mandatory labeling,” according to The Hill, echoing powerful interest groups that have already declared war against such “right to know” labeling laws around the nation.
It was revealed in recent months that powerful farming and biotechnology interest groups like Monsanto were joining forces – under the name 'Coalition for Safe Affordable Food' – to push a federal voluntary labeling standard for food made with genetically-modified organisms (GMOs) in an effort to stem the tide of state legislation seeking to mandate labeling.
In recent years, voters in states such as California and Washington have narrowly defeated ballot initiatives proposing mandatory GMO labeling, though not without dragging members of the new Coalition into expensive campaigns to defeat the measures. Many other states are now considering their own proposals to label GMO food.
A top member of the Coalition – the Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA), a major food industry lobbying group – raised and spent the bulk of the overall $22 million that opponents of labeling sank into defeating Washington State’s ballot initiative on GMO labeling last year. That total number was three times the amount that proponents of labeling spent in the state. GMA was joined in its effort by allies such as biotech giants Monsanto, Bayer, and DuPont.
The Coalition said in February that it would seek to empower the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) “to establish federal standards for companies that want to voluntarily label their product for the absence-of or presence-of GMO food ingredients.” In addition, the Coalition proposes the FDA mandate labels for GMO food or ingredients that the agency deems a “health, safety or nutrition issue,” though no consumables currently fall in such a category.
“The legislation we’re proposing would preclude state legislation that conflicts with the federal standards,” GMA president Pamela Bailey said of the Coalition’s aim, The Hill reported.
Read More Here
Related articles
Koch ally to introduce Monsanto-backed bill to bar state GMO labeling laws
Rep. Pompeo to Introduce Koch-Funded, Monsanto-Backed, Voluntary GMO Food Labeling Bill
Biotech Bullies Spend Nearly 500k To Combat Two Oregon GMO Measures
Food, biotech groups banding together to influence GMO labeling efforts
Sunday, March 23, 2014
Michigan CPS has gigantic secret list of parents labeled "child abusers" without due process
Published on Mar 21, 2014
http://www.policestateusa.com/2014/mi...MICHIGAN -- Hundreds of thousands of parents have been flagged as "child abusers" in a huge database maintained in secret by Michigan's Child Protective Services (CPS) agency. The names are entered into the database without due process, without a judicial hearing, without an opportunity for defense, without a conviction, and without even letting the individuals know they have been targeted.
.....
Secret list: Having your name on this secret Michigan list of 275,000 people could cost you your job
The state maintains something called the Michigan Child Abuse and Neglect Central Registry and the sole power to label you an abuser lies not with a judge or a jury, but with child protective services workers.
And you may be surprised at how the state can define “abuse.”
Anita Belle says she’s never been convicted of a crime. But Belle’s name has been put on the Central Registry as a child abuser.
“Where is the due process,” asked Belle.
The Central Registry is maintained by Child Protective Services workers inside Michigan’s Department of Human Services, or DHS.
Right now, there are about 275,000 people on that secret list and many of them don’t even realize they are on it. You don’t have to be found guilty in court to be put on the registry. All it takes is the word of CPS staffers to label you an abuser, which can prevent you from getting certain jobs or doing volunteer work.
“A sex offender gets to be convicted beyond a reasonable doubt, and then they’re placed on the sex offender registry, but parents and grandparents and teachers -- for goodness sake, a child could just make up something,” Belle told 7 Action News Investigator Heather Catallo.
It was Anita Belle’s granddaughter who accused her and other relatives of spanking. And Belle’s case shows just how inconsistent the rules to get on the list can be: her CPS investigative report recommends Belle NOT be labeled an abuser.
“In your CPS report they say you should not be put on the central registry,” asked Catallo
“That’s correct,” said Belle.
“So how did you get put on the registry,” asked Catallo.
“I don’t know,” said Belle.
As the law stands now, once you’re on the registry -- you’re on for life. You can ask for a hearing in front of an administrative law judge to be taken off the list, although that’s not easy to do.
But the law is changing in September. The new law will limit your time on the registry to 10 years, unless you were put on the list for criminal sexual conduct, battery, life threatening injuries, abandonment, or exposing a child to methamphetamine production.
But those labels are not always what they seem: the 7 Investigators have documented many cases of parents being accused of abandonment or neglect when they were simply trying to get help for the children from the state.
“The current reforms don’t go far enough,” said attorney Elizabeth Warner, who is suing the Governor, DHS and other state officials because she says the secret list is unconstitutional.
“You should be given an opportunity before the harm happens, to get a fair hearing,” said Warner.
Warner says CPS has too much power.
“You just get on the registry, by a push of the button. By one worker,” said Warner.
“With no verification that the crime was actually committed,” asked Catallo.
“They believe that their investigation, even if it’s one sided, is all they need to ruin somebody’s life,” said Warner.
“What do you say to the people who say CPS has way too much power,” Catallo asked.
Read More Here
.....
Related articles
Does medical marijuana make you an unfit parent?
Does medical marijuana equal bad parenting?
Another Confession About Abuse by CPS by a Former CPS Worker
CPS considering further cases of alleged FGM
275K NAMES: Secret MI list could cost you a job
Sunday, February 23, 2014
SEKULOW: FCC backpedals on wrongheaded newsroom-monitoring plan
| Source |
|
| Author | Federal Communications Commission |
public domain.
.....
The Washington Times
Americans say no to the ‘monitoring’ of free speech
By Jordan Sekulow and Matthew Clark
Friday, February 21, 2014
Recently, the Obama administration’s Federal Communications Commission (FCC) proposed a program, euphemistically labeled a “Multi-Market Study of Critical Information Needs,” to place government monitors in the newsrooms of TV networks, “news and talk-radio stations,” and newspaper companies across the United States.
Imagine FCC monitors peering over the shoulders of editors, producers and reporters as they make decisions about what news to air and how to communicate it to the public.
This monitoring program, as Orwellian as it sounds, moved along toward implementation this spring, completely out of the public spotlight. That is, until FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai sounded the alarm, exposing the FCC’s “plans to send researchers to grill reporters, editors and station owners about how they decide which stories to run.”
He was rightly concerned, and the American people took notice.
FCC monitors in newsrooms across America would pose a monumental threat to free speech and freedom of the press. The FCC already exercises immense control over broadcast stations through license renewal every eight years. These monitors would give the FCC the ability to intimidate the press on a daily basis.
The fact is, this was not a “study” in any sense of the word. The FCC began by developing eight categories of information that it prejudged as the “critical information needs” of the American public.
Sending monitors into newsrooms would be nothing more than a witch hunt to intimidate stations that don’t fall in line with programming that conforms to the predetermined “needs” of the Obama administration.
According to the program’s design, the station owners, managers and reporters would be asked intrusive questions about their “news philosophy” and “target audience.”
If these questions sound eerily familiar, it’s because they are some of the same questions demanded of Tea Party, pro-life and other conservative groups who have been wrongly targeted by the Internal Revenue Service: What is your philosophy? Who are your members? What issues do you promote?
Read More Here
File - In this Aug. 9, 2013 file photo, FCC Commissioner Ajit ... more >
Related articles
Petition protests Obama plans to monitor newsrooms
Obama administration's plans to monitor newsrooms : "This is an extremely troubling and dangerous development that represents the latest in an ongoing assault on the Constitution by the Obama Administration," chief counsel of the ACLJ Jay Sekulow
Charles Krauthammer Recommends Congress Defund FCC's Outrageous Newsroom Study
FCC drops newsroom 'monitor' plan
Monday, January 20, 2014
Maine becomes second state to require GMO labels
By Reid Wilson
Maine Gov. Paul LePage in June 2013. (Robert F. Bukaty/AP)Maine will become the second state to require labels on food that contains genetically modified ingredients under new legislation signed by Gov. Paul LePage (R) this week — but only after other states follow suit.
LePage signed the legislation, initially introduced by a Republican state representative, over the objections of agriculture giants who produce many of the raw ingredients that go into everyday foods.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture estimates that about 70 percent of the food products sold in supermarkets contain genetically modified ingredients, the Portland Press-Herald reported.
But shoppers in Maine won’t see those GMO labels slapped all over grocery stores any time soon. The legislation doesn’t go into effect until five nearby states, including New Hampshire, pass similar labeling laws. New Hampshire’s legislature will take up a similar measure during its legislative session this year.
That provision was necessary, the bill’s backers said, to build a broad base of support. It’s similar to a provision in a GMO labeling bill passed by Connecticut’s legislature, signed into law last month by Gov. Dannel Malloy (D), which won’t take effect until a combination of Northeastern states that add up to 20 million residents pass similar legislation.
Read More Here
Related articles
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







