Common Dreams
Critics Refute NSA Defense of 'Terrorist Thwarting' Spy Program
NSA Director Gen. Keith Alexander defended the sweeping spy program before Congress Wednesday. (Photo: J. Scott Applewhite/ AP)As the Obama administration and the National Security Administration continue to defend their massive spy and data collection program by asserting that the information has been essential in preventing "dozens of terrorist attacks," new analysis reveals that these assertions are false, amounting to little more than "wide-ranging fishing expeditions with little to show for them."
Top intelligence officials, including NSA director Gen. Keith Alexander, speaking before Congress Wednesday said that the NSA secret spy program has helped thwart over 50 "potential terrorist events," including 10 within the United States.
A new examination of all incidents of "homegrown jihadist and non-jihadist terrorism" in the US since 9/11 by the nonprofit think-tank the New America Foundation along with Syracuse's Maxwell School found that "NSA surveillance yielded little of major value to prevent numerous attacks in the United States."
"This suggests that the NSA surveillance programs are wide-ranging fishing expeditions with little to show for them," writes Peter Bergen, CNN national security analyst and director at the New America Foundation.
Bergen continues:
Homegrown jihadist extremists have mounted 42 plots to conduct attacks within the United States since 2001. Of those plots, nine involved an actual terrorist act that was not prevented by any type of government action, such as the failed attempt by Faisal Shahzad to blow up a car bomb in Times Square on May 1, 2010."[W]e are...concerned that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Section 702 collection program [...] and the bulk phone records collection program operating under Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT ACT are being conflated in a way that exaggerates the value and usefulness of the bulk phone records collection program," said Senators Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Mark Udall (D-Colo.) in a statement released Wednesday.
Of the remaining 33 plots, the public record shows that at least 29 were uncovered by traditional law enforcement methods, such as the use of informants, reliance on community tips about suspicious activity and other standard policing practices.
"Based on the evidence that we have seen," continue the senators, "it appears that the bulk phone records collection program under section 215 of the USA Patriot Act played little or no role in most of these disruptions. Saying that 'these programs' have disrupted 'dozens of potential terrorist plots' is misleading if the bulk phone records collection program is actually providing little or no unique value."
The two Senators have consistently criticized their program, even prior to its leak to the public. As Udall told the Denver Post earlier this month, he knew that the NSA's actions were wrong. He added, “[I] did everything short of leaking classified information” to stop it.
_____________________
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
Published on Jun 19, 2013
Piers Morgan spoke tonight to Glenn Greenwald, the journalist who broke the story of government surveillance wide open, and Daniel Ellsberg, the man responsible for the release of the Pentagon Papers over 40 years ago. Morgan asked Greenwald to respond to the claims by the NSA head that the leaks "help America's enemies." Greenwald says the government is just reading from the same playbook it does every time "somebody exposes what they want to hide from the people over whom they're ruling," telling Morgan they prefer to "rule in fear" over the American people.
Morgan asked Greenwald if he thinks the government is "lying" when it says 50 terrorist attacks have been thwarted by the NSA program. Greenwald said it's just misleading, adding that it is harder to thwart plots with this kind of Dragnet program "because they're collecting so much stuff they don't even know what they have."Ellsberg told Morgan that there is obviously a "need for secrecy" in certain cases, and that's why he did not release a lot more information back in 1971. However, he noted that warrantless searches and seizures helped fuel the American Revolution, and remarked that if Obama truly welcomes the debate on NSA surveillance, he should be thanking Snowden for making it public in the first place.
Morgan asked Ellsberg if he believes Snowden was right to stay or right to flee the country. Ellsberg said Snowden did the right thing, because if he didn't he'd be in the same position as Bradley Manning, and contrasted that with how he himself was able to get out on bail and go before the American people to explain himself in 1971 when the government targeted him.
Greenwald concluded the segment by saying the big issue comes down to a lack of government oversight in which widespread abuse can exist, dismissing the idea that just because certain things are not within the legal boundaries of the NSA doesn't mean they can't be done.
**************************************************************************
Related articles
- Live blog: NSA Hearing (politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com)
- Rand Paul vows supreme court challenge to NSA surveillance - live - The Guardian (guardian.co.uk)
- The simple change in wording that shows why you should ignore polls on the NSA leak (dailykos.com)
- Time to Revisit the Patriot Act (wvjoe911.wordpress.com)
- Around The Internets: NSA Surveillance Scandal Reader (notthesingularity.com)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Hello and thank you for visiting my blog. Please share your thoughts and leave a comment :)