The administration now says it has "high confidence" that President Bashar Assad's forces have killed up to 150 people with sarin gas. Although that's a tiny percentage of the approximately 93,000 killed in the civil war so far, the use of a chemical weapon crosses President Barack Obama's "red line" for escalating U.S. involvement in the conflict and prompted the decision to send arms and ammunition, not just humanitarian aid and defensive non-lethal help like armored vests and night goggles.
The administration's plan heading into the G8 meeting of industrialized nations beginning Monday is to use the chemical weapons announcement and Obama's decision on arms to persuade Russia to increase pressure on Assad to send a credible negotiating team to Geneva for talks with the opposition.
In a letter to U.N. Secretary General Ban-Ki Moon, U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice said the United States has determined that sarin was used in a March 19 attack on the Aleppo suburb of Khan al-Assal and in an April 13 attack on the neighborhood of Shaykh Maqsud. She said unspecified chemicals, possibly including chemical warfare agents, were used May 14 in an attack on Qasr Abu Samrah and in a May 23 attack on Adra.
U.S. officials have not disclosed any details about the weapons they intend to send to Syria or when and how they will be delivered. According to officials, the U.S. is most likely to provide the rebel fighters with small arms, ammunition, assault rifles and a variety of anti-tank weaponry such as shoulder-fired rocket-propelled grenades and other missiles.
As of Friday, however, no final decisions had been made on the details or when it would reach the rebels, according to the officials, who insisted on anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss internal administration discussions with reporters.
Obama has consistently said he will not put American troops in Syria, making it less likely the U.S. will provide sophisticated arms or anti-aircraft weapons that would require large-scale training. Administration officials are also worried about high-powered weapons ending up in the hands of terrorist groups. Hezbollah fighters are among those backing Assad's armed forces, and al-Qaida-linked extremists back the rebellion.
The lethal aid will largely be coordinated by the CIA, but that effort will also be buttressed by an increased U.S. military presence in Jordan.
*****************************************************************************
Exclusive: Obama Asks Pentagon for Syria No-Fly Zone Plan
Updated
Pentagon
spokesman Dave Lapan sent the following statement to The Daily Beast
after this story posted: “There is no new planning effort underway. The
Joint Staff, along with the relevant combatant commanders, continue to
conduct prudent planning for a range of possible military options.”
Along with no-fly zone plans, the White House is considering arming parts of the Syrian opposition and formally recognizing the Syrian opposition council, reports Josh Rogin.
The
White House has asked the Pentagon to draw up plans for a no-fly zone
inside Syria that would be enforced by the U.S. and other countries such
as France and Great Britain, two administration officials told The
Daily Beast.
The
request was made shortly before Secretary of State John Kerry toured
the Middle East last week to try and finalize plans for an early June
conference between the Syrian regime and rebel leaders in Geneva. The
opposition, however, has yet to confirm its attendance and is demanding
that the end of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s rule be a
precondition for negotiations, a condition Assad is unlikely to accept.
President
Obama’s dual-track strategy of continuing to pursue a political
solution to the two-year-old uprising in Syria while also preparing for
more direct U.S. military involvement includes authorizing the Joint
Chiefs of Staff for the first time to plan for multilateral military
actions inside Syria, the two officials said. They added that no
decisions on actually using force have yet been made.
“The
White House is still in contemplation mode but the planning is moving
forward and it’s more advanced than it’s ever been,” one administration
official told The Daily Beast. “All this effort to pressure the regime
is part of the overall effort to find a political solution, but what
happens if Geneva fails? It’s only prudent to plan for other options.”
In
a May 8 meeting of the National Security Council Principals Committee,
the White House tasked several agencies with reporting on the pros and
cons of two additional potential courses of action: arming vetted and
moderate elements of the Syrian opposition, such as the Free Syrian
Army, and formally recognizing the Syrian opposition council as the
government of Syria, which would mean removing formal U.S. recognition
of the Assad regime.
Sen. John McCain—who’s advocated for more aggressive U.S. support of the Syrian rebels and who traveled secretly
into the country Monday to meet with the leaders of the Free Syrian
Army—told The Daily Beast last week that despite the request for plans
he doubts the White House will decide to implement a no-fly zone in
Syria. The Pentagon and the Joint Chiefs are opposed to the idea, he
said.
“One
thing about the Pentagon, if they don’t want to do something, they will
tell you all sorts of reasons why they can’t do it. It’s going to take
significant pressure for them to come up with realistic plans,” McCain
said. “They will invent ways for us not to do it until the president of
the United States says we’ve got to do it.”
McCain
said a realistic plan for a no-fly zone would include hundreds of
planes, and would be most effective if it included destroying Syrian
airplanes on runways, bombing those runways, and moving U.S. Patriot
missile batteries in Turkey close to the border so they could protect
airspace inside northern Syria.
In
April, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey told the
House Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense that the military was
planning for a range of options in Syria but that he did not necessarily
support using those options.
Read More Here
*****************************************************************************
The Economic Collapse
Well,
isn't that convenient? At the moment when the Obama administration is
feeling more heat then ever before, it starts another war. Suddenly
everyone in the mainstream media is talking all about Syria and not
about the IRS scandal, Benghazi, NSA snooping
or any of the other political scandals that have popped up in recent
weeks. As if on cue, Obama made headlines all over the globe on
Thursday by claiming that the Syrian government has used chemical
weapons against the rebels "multiple times", and that the U.S. was now
ready to do more to assist the rebels. That assistance is reportedly
going to include "military support" for the rebels and a no-fly zone
over at least part of Syria is being discussed. Without a doubt, these
are acts of war, and this conflict is not going to end until Assad has
been ousted. But Assad will not go quietly. And all it would take is
for Assad to fire a couple of missiles at Tel Aviv for a huge regional
war to erupt in the Middle East. And what happens if Russia or China
decides to get involved in the conflict in Syria? Obama is playing with
fire, but he has shown again and again that he is willing to do
virtually anything if it will benefit him politically.
As far as the Obama administration is concerned, there is no such thing as a coincidence. The timing of this announcement regarding Syria was not an accident. If Obama wanted to use chemical weapons as an excuse to go after Syria he could have done it weeks ago, or he could have waited several more months before taking action. He chose to do it right now for a reason, and hopefully the American people will be able to see right through this.
So exactly what are we going to be doing for the Syrian rebels? Well, we will definitely be arming them and training them. And it is probably reasonable to assume that there will be American "advisers" on the ground inside Syria helping to organize the Syrian resistance. In fact, according to Debka, a large U.S. Marine force has already been deployed to the Jordanian border with Syria.
In addition, according to the Wall Street Journal, U.S. aircraft may be involved in enforcing a no-fly zone inside Syria...
And several prominent Republicans are already rushing forward to applaud Barack Obama on this latest move. The following comes from a CBS News report...
Yes, you read that correctly.
The whole point of the "war on terror" was to supposedly fight al-Qaeda, but now the U.S. military is allied with them.
Why in the world would we want to help the people who are supposed to be our greatest global enemy?...
Read More Here
*****************************************************************************
Read More Here
*****************************************************************************
The Economic Collapse
Is Obama Starting A War With Syria Just To Distract Us From All The Scandals?
As far as the Obama administration is concerned, there is no such thing as a coincidence. The timing of this announcement regarding Syria was not an accident. If Obama wanted to use chemical weapons as an excuse to go after Syria he could have done it weeks ago, or he could have waited several more months before taking action. He chose to do it right now for a reason, and hopefully the American people will be able to see right through this.
So exactly what are we going to be doing for the Syrian rebels? Well, we will definitely be arming them and training them. And it is probably reasonable to assume that there will be American "advisers" on the ground inside Syria helping to organize the Syrian resistance. In fact, according to Debka, a large U.S. Marine force has already been deployed to the Jordanian border with Syria.
In addition, according to the Wall Street Journal, U.S. aircraft may be involved in enforcing a no-fly zone inside Syria...
A U.S. military proposal for arming Syrian rebels also calls for a limited no-fly zone inside Syria that would be enforced from Jordanian territory to protect Syrian refugees and rebels who would train there, according to U.S. officials.No matter how you slice it, the United States is now in a state of war with Syria. The only question is how "involved" we are going to get.
Asked by the White House to develop options for Syria, military planners have said that creating an area to train and equip rebel forces would require keeping Syrian aircraft well away from the Jordanian border.
To do that, the military envisages creating a no-fly zone stretching up to 25 miles into Syria which would be enforced using aircraft flown from Jordanian bases and flying inside the kingdom, according to U.S. officials.
And several prominent Republicans are already rushing forward to applaud Barack Obama on this latest move. The following comes from a CBS News report...
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., who met with the rebels last month and has been a vocal critic of the president's Syria policy said in a joint statement with Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.: "We appreciate the President's finding that the Assad regime has used chemical weapons on several occasions. We also agree with the President that this fact must affect U.S. policy toward Syria. The President's red line has been crossed. U.S. credibility is on the line. Now is not the time to merely take the next incremental step. Now is the time for more decisive actions."But you know what? Many of these Syrian rebels have actually pledged allegiance to al-Qaeda.
Yes, you read that correctly.
The whole point of the "war on terror" was to supposedly fight al-Qaeda, but now the U.S. military is allied with them.
Why in the world would we want to help the people who are supposed to be our greatest global enemy?...
Read More Here
*****************************************************************************
Related articles
- Obama Authorizes Sending Weapons To Syrian Rebels (aworldchaos.wordpress.com)
- Obama steps up aid to Syrian rebels (kypost.com)
- US to start arming Syria rebels (worldbulletin.net)
- Obama to step up military support of Syrian rebels (stripes.com)
- U.S. to increase military support to Syria rebels (thehimalayantimes.com)
- Obama Authorizes Arming Syrian Rebels After Conclusive Chemical Weapon Evidence Found (theepochtimes.com)
- Syria: Obama decides to arm rebels (wjla.com)
- Syrian rebel leader to visit US (vancouverdesi.com)
- Syria crosses Obama's chemical weapons 'red line', U.S. to send 'military assistance' to rebels (globalnews.ca)
- Your CRIMINAL Gov't: Obama Asks Pentagon for Syria No-Fly Zone Plan (sgtreport.com)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Hello and thank you for visiting my blog. Please share your thoughts and leave a comment :)